Why did
some world leaders and theologians feel that flying would be the end of
mankind?
According
to Tom Crouch in his book Wings, as
long as mankind has dreamed of flying there have been those who have cautioned
against it. Most notably, early
philosophers linked flying with omniscient or God-like traits and theorized
that the reason man was not endowed with the ability to fly “naturally” was
because mankind would “play God” – to disastrous effects. For instance, notes Crouch, noted thinkers
such as William Derham were convinced that men could not be trusted to behave
themselves, would engage in “mischief,” and “would make ‘the world seem a
thousandfold hateful and more ruinous’” (357).
Human nature dictates that there are those who are good and those who
are bad, and the bad simply cannot be trusted.
Like pre-flight philosophers, many world leaders worried about the
negative effects of human flight on civilization. By this time, though, the horse had left the
barn – once mankind had the ability to fly there was no stopping the use of
aircraft against civilians. Some
influential statesmen, like Winston Churchill, proposed heavy regulation of
military aviation – even to the point of an outright ban (Crouch 357). Unfortunately, although deadly and terrible,
aerial strikes (even those against civilians) were deemed effective military
strategies and so the predictions of early thinkers proved accurate.
What
factors influenced the development of the aircraft carrier and what role did it
play in WWII?
In his book
Wings, author Tom Crouch explains that using ships to launch aircraft occurred
many years before the onset of WWII. It
was an American who is credited with being the first to do a landing/takeoff
maneuver (Crouch 359). But this isn’t
the same thing as actually “launching” an aircraft from a ship. The British began working to create a ship
dedicated to carrying and launching aircraft from the sea as early as WWI. Other nations with strong naval presences
began to study and emulate the successes of the Western nations’
developments. In particular, the
Japanese were eager to gain this technology and prior to WWII they were
considered friendly with the West and so were given access to our
technology. It became clear when they debuted
their first aircraft carrier that the Japanese would be an important player in
this field. As time went on, innovations
in the field occurred – including tailhooks to catch planes and ship design
elements to maximize “stowing, handling, and launching” capabilities (Crouch
360). Because there were treaties in place about the commissioning of warships,
seafaring countries got around the rules by converting existing ships (even
ocean liners) into aircraft carriers.
The role these carriers played in WWII was substantial. Their initial mission was “to conduct
reconnaissance and provide air cover,” but later was amended to use aircraft launched
from sea to “attack the enemy” (Crouch 361).
Although Great Britain, Japan, and the United States were the only
nations to use aircraft carriers during WWII, their use was very impactful
(Crouch 405). In the Atlantic, U.S. and
British carriers were eventually able to use “electronic searching systems”
which “broke the U-boat [German submarine] terror” (Crouch 406). In the Pacific, the United States had small
military bases scattered throughout the Pacific Islands. These were vulnerable to the Japanese navy
because they were basically sitting ducks.
With aircraft carriers, the U.S. could engage in long distance battles
between aircraft carriers and the Japanese fleets could no longer threaten the
outlying American island bases (Crouch 406).
When these sea battles caused ship and aircraft losses, the United
States, being the wealthier nation, was able to replace their lost arsenal
faster than the Japanese – a significant advantage.
What
type of aircraft emerged from the design revolution of the 1930’s and what role
would it play during WWII?
No comments:
Post a Comment