1. Did flight have
any influence outside of aviation? If so, how?
Yes, outside of aviation, flight had an influence on many
different areas; “like everyone else, the artists and intellectuals got caught
up in the excitement of flight” (Crouch, 121). Cubist painters became involved
and went to Issy-les-Moulineaux and began to build mode airplanes, and Gabriele
D’Annunzio, an Italian poet and novelist, as well as the pet Filippo Tommaso
Marinetti, began to write about flight in their literature. Others, such as
Vasily Vasilyevich Kamensky, became interested in flight and together with
others he began to lecture on airplanes. Additionally, popular culture was
heavily affected by flight with “clocks, fans, pencil boxes, cigarette cases, pitchers,
places and ginger jars were a few of the items emblazoned with the images of
airplanes in flight” (Crouch, 123). Pulp magazine yarns also began to have
stories about flight, contrary to people having grown up reading dime-novel
tales. Children began to play with aviation dolls and model airplanes as well
as other games and puzzles, and another popular item were aeronautical
postcards. Language was also affected by aviation with many of the words being
of French origin, such as aviation, fuselage, and helicopter. Flight also affected
the field of science with people in other fields such as physics and
engineering, becoming interested in helping further research how to develop
flight.
5. In your opinion,
did the Wright Brothers’ patent suits affect the progress of aviation?
The patent suits began on August 18-19, 1911 when the Wright
Brothers filed a complaint against Glenn Curtiss prohibiting him from making,
selling, or exhibiting airplanes that infringed on the Wright Brother’s patents
as well as filing a suit against the Aeronautic Society of New York prohibiting
them from exhibiting a Curtis airplane. Additionally the Wright Brothers sought
several other injunctions. These various patent suits were all consuming for
two years and many in the government and aeronautic industry agreed that these
suits retarded the growth of American Aeronautics and had “”caused the United
States to fall from first place to last of all the great nations in the air””(Crouch,
147). However, I do not think that these patent suits severely hindered the
progress of aviation. I do not believe that the Wright Brother’s did it for the
profit, although Orville did profit from the suits, but rather I think that
they did it to protect their rights and their ideas that they had worked so
hard to achieve. Although these patent suits probably did slow down some of the
progress in aviation in America, I do not believe that it had any significant hindrance
on the progress of aviation in American.
7. What was the cult
of the heroic airman?
According to the author, the cult of the heroic airman “began
as a natural extension of the adulation lavished on the aeronautical heroes of
the prewar era” (156). The French culture had given great admiration to their
pilots, both in racing and in exhibition, as well as to the men who risked
their lives to achieve a French victory. The cult of the heroic airman were
French airman that had somehow made some contribution to the French during the
war and had managed to inspire the country by defending the French nation. One
of the first as Ronald Garros. According to a story written about him in a newspaper,
he had shown his dedication to his country when he sacrificed himself for
France by throwing himself and his aircraft straight at a German aircraft which
resulted in both parties deaths. Although this story was deemed to be false, “the
French needed heroes” (Crouch, 156). These heroic airman were used to inspire
the country as “the aviator…was like a medieval knight, boldly carrying out the
national standard into combat with a champion from the other side. Such a man
would live or die on the basis of his own skill and courage” (Crouch, 156).
Crouch, Tom D. Wings: A History of Aviation from
Kites to the Space Age. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian National Air and
Space Museum, 2003. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment